Semantic Abstract MachineSAM v4.3
SAM‑style gates describe the verification model: behavior-gated checks that confirm preservation before a route is claimed publicly.
Executes and verifies semantic preservation of the USG step by step via a SAM‑style harness.
Verification Harness: Performs execution/inference-based review via a SAM‑style harness.
Machine Definition
Semantic program interpretation through state-based execution model
State Structure
SAM maintains a state defined as a 5-tuple, where each state element is responsible for a specific aspect of the execution process.
Current Node (N)
Identifier of the currently executing semantic atom
Environment (E)
Environment stack managing identifier-value bindings
Continuation (C)
Stack representing the continuation of future computations
Memory (M)
Abstract heap managing mutable state and allocated objects
Execution Model
Step-by-step execution process directly interpreting semantic atoms
Execution Steps
- 1. Acquire semantic atom from current node
- 2. Select execution rule based on atom type
- 3. Update environment and memory state
- 4. Transition to next execution node
1// SAM execution function example
2type SAMState = {
3 currentNode: int,
4 environment: EnvironmentType,
5 continuation: Array<string>
6}
7
8function executeStep(state: SAMState, graph: USG) -> Result<SAMState, Error> {
9 let currentAtom = graph.getAtom(state.currentNode)?
10
11 match currentAtom.kind {
12 case "Binding" => {
13 let value = evaluateExpression(currentAtom.expression, state)?
14 let nextEnvironment = state.environment.bind(currentAtom.identifier, value)
15 Ok(state{ environment: nextEnvironment, currentNode: state.currentNode + 1 })
16 }
17 case "Conditional" => {
18 let conditionResult = evaluateExpression(currentAtom.condition, state)?
19 let nextNode = if conditionResult.isTruthy() { currentAtom.trueNode } else { currentAtom.falseNode }
20 Ok(state{ currentNode: nextNode })
21 }
22 case _ => Ok(state)
23 }
24}Memory Management
Conceptual abstractions describing language-specific memory semantics
Abstract Heap Model
Model describing allocation/ownership/lifetime concepts across languages, described at a conceptual level.
Garbage Collection
Describes reachability/lifetime concepts from a visualization/analysis perspective.
Type Safety
Conceptually describes use of type hints and region labels
Optimization Engine
Advanced program optimization utilizing semantic information
Optimization Techniques
- Semantic constant propagation and folding
- Dead code elimination and unreachable code detection
- Semantic-based parallelization analysis support
- Memory access pattern optimization
1// Optimization hints structure example
2type OptimizationHints = {
3 inlineCandidates: Array<int>,
4 parallelRegions: Array<string>,
5 constantValues: Map<string, int>,
6 memoryPatterns: Array<string>
7}
8
9function applyOptimizations(graph: USG, hints: OptimizationHints) -> USG {
10 let afterConstants = propagateConstants(graph, hints.constantValues)
11 let afterInlining = applyInlining(afterConstants, hints.inlineCandidates)
12 let afterParallel = applyParallelization(afterInlining, hints.parallelRegions)
13 return applyMemoryOptimization(afterParallel, hints.memoryPatterns)
14}
15
16let hints = analyzeOptimizations(usg)
17let optimized = applyOptimizations(usg, hints)Runtime System
Runtime support system for efficient execution
Dynamic Type System
Maintains and validates type information at runtime to ensure type safety while supporting flexible execution
Exception Handling
Provides consistent error handling model by integrating language-specific exception handling mechanisms
Debugging Support
Provides debugging information at semantic level and execution tracing functionality
Verification & Execution Policy
Semantic preservation verification system through SAM‑style harness
Preservation Axioms (Phase-1)
Semantic preservation of sequential execution, conditional branching, and iteration structures
Deterministic execution of side-effect-free computation and data transformation
Exception propagation and handling in try/catch/finally structures
Semantic preservation of functional patterns like map, filter, fold
Non-Preservation Areas
External interactions like file system, network, user input
Undefined behavior and implementation-specific differences
Language-specific memory ordering and concurrency details
Language-specific features and compiler extensions
SAM‑style Harness
Step-by-step review of semantic preservation via execution/inference
Consistent verification environment through standardized SAM implementation
Core Components
Relationship between SAM and other core components of Core Semantic Kernel